Login to myESAIC Membership


The ESAIC is dedicated to supporting professionals in anaesthesiology and intensive care by serving as the hub for development and dissemination of valuable educational, scientific, research, and networking resources.



The ESAIC hosts the Euroanaesthesia and Focus Meeting congresses that serve as platforms for cutting-edge science and innovation in the field. These events bring together experts, foster networking, and facilitate knowledge exchange in anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain management, and perioperative medicine. Euroanaesthesia is one of the world’s largest and most influential scientific congresses for anaesthesia professionals. Held annually throughout Europe, our congress is a contemporary event geared towards education, knowledge exchange and innovation in anaesthesia, intensive care, pain and perioperative medicine, as well as a platform for immense international visibility for scientific research.


Professional Growth

The ESAIC's mission is to foster and provide exceptional training and educational opportunities. The ESAIC ensures the provision of robust and standardised examination and certification systems to support the professional development of anaesthesiologists and to ensure outstanding future doctors in the field of anaesthesiology and intensive care.



The ESAIC aims to advance patient outcomes and contribute to the progress of anaesthesiology and intensive care evidence-based practice through research. The ESAIC Clinical Trial Network (CTN), the Academic Contract Research Organisation (A-CRO), the Research Groups and Grants all contribute to the knowledge and clinical advances in the peri-operative setting.

Learn more about the ESAIC Clinical Trial Network (CTN) and the associated studies.


EU Projects

The ESAIC is actively involved as a consortium member in numerous EU funded projects. Together with healthcare leaders and practitioners, the ESAIC's involvement as an EU project partner is another way that it is improving patient outcomes and ensuring the best care for every patient.


Patient Safety

The ESAIC aims to promote the professional role of anaesthesiologists and intensive care physicians and enhance perioperative patient outcomes by focusing on quality of care and patient safety strategies. The Society is committed to implementing the Helsinki Declaration and leading patient safety projects.



To ESAIC is committed to implementing the Glasgow Declaration and drive initiatives towards greater environmental sustainability across anaesthesiology and intensive care in Europe.



The ESAIC works in collaboration with industry, national societies, and specialist societies to promote advancements in anaesthesia and intensive care. The Industry Partnership offers visibility and engagement opportunities for industry participants with ESAIC members, facilitating understanding of specific needs in anaesthesiology and in intensive care. This partnership provides resources for education and avenues for collaborative projects enhancing science, education, and patient safety. The Specialist Societies contribute to high-quality educational opportunities for European anaesthesiologists and intensivists, fostering discussion and sharing, while the National Societies, through NASC, maintain standards, promote events and courses, and facilitate connections. All partnerships collectively drive dialogue, learning, and growth in the anaesthesiology and intensive care sector.



Guidelines play a crucial role in delivering evidence-based recommendations to healthcare professionals. Within the fields of anaesthesia and intensive care, guidelines are instrumental in standardizing clinical practices and enhancing patient outcomes. For many years, the ESAIC has served as a pivotal platform for facilitating continuous advancements, improving care standards and harmonising clinical management practices across Europe.



With over 40 years of publication history, the EJA (European Journal of Anaesthesiology) has established itself as a highly respected and influential journal in its field. It covers a wide range of topics related to anaesthesiology and intensive care medicine, including perioperative medicine, pain management, critical care, resuscitation, and patient safety.



Becoming a member of ESAIC implies becoming a part of a vibrant community of nearly 8,000 professionals who exchange best practices and stay updated on the latest developments in anaesthesiology, intensive care and perioperative medicine. ESAIC membership equips you with the tools and resources necessary to enhance your daily professional routine, nurture your career growth, and play an active role in advancing anaesthesiology, intensive care and perioperative medicine.

Membership opportunities
at the ESAIC

Newsletter 2020

Once again: a unique specialty

Gabriel  M. Gurman
Chief editor

In the last years, since I became ESAIC Newsletter chief editor, I have had more than one opportunity to refer to the fact that anaesthesiology is a medical domain which, for many reasons, does not resemble any other.

We are special because of the many demands the profession has towards its physicians, because of the high responsibility for the patient’s life, and because of the vast amount of theoretical knowledge needed to practice it, doubled by the clear request for highly manual skills.

Lately, one more feature came to my mind.

It is about the usual habit/demand for periodical handover and transfer of the patient, temporary or complete, to another professional.

Almost half a century ago, when I moved to Israel from a much colder country, I was surprised during my first days of work in the operating room (OR) , when I used to be asked by my senior(s) if I needed a relief for a couple of minutes. When I kindly refused it, I was recommended to go to the OR kitchen and have a glass of cold water: “we have a warm climate, you do need it!”.

Years later, I asked myself what is behind this usual behavior, that of relieving the anaesthesiologist for a short time during a long workday.

I looked around and I tried to understand this process.

What I found out was that we, once again, are a unique specialty.

I apologise for bringing here some aspects too well known to any of my peers, but I feel the need to put them together, just to make my case.

In comparison to any other medical profession, we are obliged to spend most of our working day near a patient who needs continuous surveillance, meaning the permanent presence of the anaesthesiologist in the OR. We are the first to go in and the last to get out. While the surgeon(s) and the nurse(s) have long minutes of break between two cases, we are requested to accompany the (still) asleep patient to the recovery area, to transmit to the staff there the most important data about his/her condition, to be sure that the patient did not need us anymore and then to go back to the OR, where the next patient was already waiting for us.

Most of the surgeons work just a short number of days in the OR, but most of us are busy there almost every single working day.

Other professionals can afford breaks after their department morning rounds and the outpatient patients are usually scheduled with short breaks every couple of hours.

So, volens-nolens, we are supposed to deal with the reality which includes the handovers as part of our daily activity.

It is true, this habit is practiced in other medical domains, too (1), but it seems that anaesthesia in the OR occupies the first place regarding the frequency with which it is encountered.

The handoff or handover is defined as the process of transferring primary authority and responsibility for providing clinical care to a patient from one  departing caregiver to an incoming caregiver.

To the best of my knowledge, until recently this special aspect of our profession has not been investigated from the scientific point of view, and it seems that the handovers have been taken for granted and nobody thought to go into depth and analyse it in a more serious manner.

Even if the topic of handoverswas present in the literature and discussed some 25 years ago (2), the subject showed up on anaesthesia literature much later (3).

In most cases the handovers are done for a short period of time, minutes up to half an hour. But not too rarely we are witnessing an aspect called in the literature “complete handover” or “complete handoffs” (4,5), meaning that the first anaesthesiologist transfers the case to another one up to the end of the procedure.

Rather than being a peripheral topic related to our practice, literature specifies that the handover consists of three key aspects: transfer of information, responsibility and accountability (6), in other words a much more complicated process. It demands time, a lot of mutual confidence and understanding, and the ability to take over in the middle of a procedure.


The case for a debate is clear. One is supposed, first, to weigh the advantages vs drawbacks of the system and then to try and find the solution for minimising its negative effects.

Nobody questions the need for temporary relieving of an anaesthesiologist who is busy in the OR hour after hour. Once back to his/her patient the physician in charge with the patient could go on performing the usual tasks in a better physical shape and in a better mood.

More than this, it is obvious that the transfer of the patient, even temporarily, to a colleague’s responsibility offers a chance to correct errors and might prevent an inadvertent oversight of a required action. The receiving anaesthesiologist provides “fresh eyes” (5) and offers a new insight regarding the patient condition. It means that a serious and complete transfer of information could reduce the rate of adverse incidents during anaesthesia.

But the handover practice brings with it some clear drawbacks. Much too often the transfer of information to the relieving physician is incomplete, superficial, ineffective and it lacks a standardised way of informing the replacing physician about the patient’s full situation (co-morbidity, adverse incidents during induction, technical difficulties encountered by the surgeon, etc.).

Jones’s paper (4) reported a retrospective study of more than 300,000 adults who underwent major surgery, 6,000 of them undergoing the procedure with complete intraoperative handover of anaesthesia care. The study found out a much higher rate of adverse outcome (all-cause deaths, hospital readmission, postoperative complications) in the group of the patients with complete handover in comparison with those in the non-handover group (49% vs 29%, p<.001).

In a very recent study (7) on 700 patients who underwent major noncardiac surgery the authors reported that intraoperative complete handover between anesthesiologists was associated with an increased risk of postoperative delirium (p=0.046). More than this,patients with intraoperative complete handover had a higher incidence of non-delirium complications (P = 0.003) and stayed longer in hospital after surgery (P= 0.002).


So, it seems that one needs to look into the handoff/handover process as to a serious subject and try to propose an attitude which would minimise its negative effects, without compromising its clear practical value.

Bagian and Pauli (5) addressed this subject by declaring that “significant advancement in patient safety and transition in health care will require acceptance of standard methodologies, tools and techniques that improve communication…..”.

Lee et al (8) are of the opinion that handovers are highly susceptible to communication failure. They developed an electronic handover checklist as an educational tool to teach trainees a standardised method of handing over an anaesthesia case. Their study showed that the use of that device clearly improved the process of transferring the patient information among the anaesthesia team.

In spite of theseinteresting results, I am of an opinion that the name of the game is human communication. Failure to adequately communicate important data is the root of the incidents and accidents produced by the process of handover.

By the way, this process is not unknown to industry. There the solution was found by improving the quality of communication, by giving enough time to the receiver to get the information and to check the situation in-depth before taking over.

My message is a simple one. The process of handover/handoff is too important not to be seriously taken into consideration in the OR. The underlying problem is the lack of communication. In an era where the lack of time and production pressure are felt all over the world and influence our professional results, each of us are obliged to pay attention to the transfer of information from one professional to another during an anaesthetic procedure. This is important in every field of activity. In ours it is crucial.



1. Davis J et al J Grad Med Educ 2017;9:18

2.Sherlok C. Nursing standard 1995;52:33

3.Hudson CC et al. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth.2015;29:11–6

4.Jones PM et al JAMA 2018;319:143

5.Bagain JP and Pauli DE JAMA 2018;319:125

6.Randmaa M,et al. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015038. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015038

7.Liu GY et al J Anesth 2019; 33:295

8.Lee Sc et al. Xlin Teach 2019;16:58